Closed
Save

Study on Economic Impact of IMO Net Zero Framework

Dept. of Transportation > Maritime Administration
est. $100K – $300K

This opportunity is closed

The response deadline has passed. Review the details for future reference or to track similar opportunities.

Quick Brief

The U.S. Department of Transportation, specifically the Maritime Administration, is commissioning a study to analyze the economic impact of the International Maritime Organization's Net Zero Framework. The study will assess various policy mechanisms of the framework, including GHG pricing, emissions trading systems, and technology mandates, focusing on their potential effects on U.S. shipping costs, trade competitiveness, and compliance burdens. Proposals must be submitted by June 3, 2026, and should include recommendations for practical safeguards and alternative policy instruments.

Generated 13d ago

Scope & Requirements

The contractor will conduct a targeted cost analysis of the International Maritime Organization’s Net Zero Framework, focusing on its economic implications for the U.S. maritime sector.

Contract Details

Estimated Value
est. $100K – $300K
Similar contracts award $85K$876K (median $248K, 2,719 awards)Within typical range
NAICS Codes

Agency & Contact

Contracting Organization

Agency
TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF
Sub-Agency
Maritime Administration

Point of Contact

John A. Smith
Contracting Officer
(202) 555-0100

Key Dates

Published14d ago
May 21, 2026
Last Updated14d ago
May 21, 2026
Became Solicitation13d ago
May 21, 2026
Tracked
Response Due9d ago
May 26, 2026
Proposal Submission Deadlineyesterday
Jun 3, 202612:00 PM EDT
Proposals received after this deadline will not be considered.

Description

The purpose of this amendment no. 0002 is to provide Q&As to this RFP. CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP The U.S. Maritime Administration is commissioning a targeted cost analysis of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) “Net Zero Framework” (NZF), adopted in April 2025, that centers on the NZF’s specific policy mechanisms and their economic consequences for the United States. The study should examine, at minimum, the NZF’s: (a) global GHG

pricing/levy proposals (including scope, price trajectory, and pass-through mechanisms).

  • (b) emissions trading and crediting systems.
  • (c) use and role of carbon offsets and related crediting rules.
  • (d) fuel/energy standard or fuel blending mandates.
  • (e) technology mandates, exemptions, and phase in schedules.
  • (f) monitoring, reporting, and verification, auditing and compliance regimes.
  • (g) Fund governance, revenue collection, and allocation rules (including conditionality and funding flows to ports, projects, or countries); and
  • (h) enforcement, penalties, and potential border or trade adjustment measures. MARAD is particularly interested in how each mechanism could: (1) alter operating and capital costs for U.S. flagged and U.S. dependent shipping and logistics; (2) affect import/export unit costs (TEU/ton) and trade competitiveness. (3) change demand for U.S. energy, technology, and maritime services. (4) create administrative and compliance burdens; and (5) risk leakage, double counting, or ineffective mitigation (for example, reliance on offsets that do not deliver measurable reductions). The study should quantify impacts where feasible, identify key assumptions and uncertainties for each mechanism, and analyze distributional effects across U.S. industries, ports, and regions. The contractor should compare outcomes under: (A) the NZF as proposed (mechanism by mechanism); (B) alternative designs that limit or reshape levy/offset components; and (C) delayed or phased implementation scenarios. For each mechanism, the study must recommend practical safeguards, alternative policy instruments, or design changes that would reduce unnecessary economic burdens on U.S. interests while maintaining emissions outcomes rooted in reality, and provide clear metrics and analytical methods that MARAD and U.S. negotiators can use to evaluate NZF proposals moving forward. For each mechanism, the study shall compare the proposed mechanism relative to a “No Action” approach to fully distinguish the costs and benefits to U.S. maritime, trade, and economic interests. CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP Submission Dates and Times. The deadline for proposal submission is 12:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, June 3, 2026. Please submit proposals in PDF format via email to: Christian Onwudiegwu at [email protected] and Kelly Mitchell-Caroll at [email protected]. Do not send paper copies, or other media of the proposal via post . Proposals received by MARAD after the deadline will not be considered for award. An email will be deemed “received” by MARAD on the date and time the email was “sent” to the email address in Section E.7, below, as determined by MARAD’s servers. CAREFULLY REVIEW ENTIRE ATTACHED RFP Christian Onwudiegwu Alternative

Point of Contact Kelly Mitchell-Carroll to this opportunity. RFP 693JF726R000015 Terms And Conditions.pdf Amendment No.2 RFP 693JF726R000015 Net Zero Framework.pdf Q and A Amendment No.1 RFP 693JF726R000015 Net Zero Framework.pdf

Get matched to contracts like this daily

Free AI-powered contract matching for your business.